MCCM Wiki
Board pack narrative layer
The narrative layer of a board pack explains what changed, why it matters, and what decision you need. AI may draft that prose only after numbers are frozen from systems of record and a human owns every claim.
Boards do not need more charts. They need fewer surprises and clearer asks. Generative AI helps with the story around the numbers. It must never author the numbers.
Freeze numbers first
Pull KPIs from finance and ops systems, lock the tables, then draft commentary. If the model can edit a total, you have the wrong workflow. Same rule MCCM uses for finance packs: commentary after freeze.
Structure the narrative
Three short blocks beat a novel: what moved, what we did, what we need from the board. Each claim should point to a table cell or appendix. Ban adjectives that cannot be audited.
Review gate is non-negotiable
CEO or CFO reviews the narrative before the pack leaves. An assistant can draft. Leadership owns the voice and the ask. Measure time-to-reviewed pack, not tokens generated.
Investor and board optics
Invented precision destroys trust faster than a late pack. If a metric is estimated, label it. If a risk is open, say so. This pairs with honest VC narrative habits even when you are not fundraising.
Where MCCM helps
We design the pack skeleton, the prompt for commentary, and the review checklist so monthly boards stop being a weekend rebuild. Start with an AI audit if the current pack process is unclear.
Related
Reporting automation with AI · KPI · What an AI audit should deliver